Mark MyWords... aka. Mr. Bunch,

This site allows the posting of images from other sites under fair use, but messages should be posted as text so that the information is stored for searching and later retrieval.

Your earlier message was converted to text and posted in place of your image.
Please place your posts in the proper format so that they can be searched and archived.

Thanks for your attention.

That's rather curious.

Why would Charles Bunch make a comment on this forum but make it in the form of a graphic image, hosted on his own site, rather than simply make his comment in form of text on this one? May it is so that he could simply rename his graphic image on his own server -- or delete the image from his server -- and -- *POOF* -- his comments vanish into thin air?

I'm also a little curious about this, since so many people have asked me but I don't have an answer to their question; "Why doesn't Bunch apply for a permit in his own name?"

At a public meeting he, (Bunch) stated that he was the manager, so why not be the owner with a permit in your own name rather than just a manager? It is logical to say that an owner with the business and permit in their own name would make more money than working as a manager with ownership interest, especially when his wife owns the building, land, and everything else.

People also ask me, "Why isn't he still a police officer in Hawaii?" I don't have the answer to that question either and I wish people would quit asking me that because I don't know, and I frankly don't care.

At any rate I thought I would put those questions on here for all of the people that ask me about it. This way Charles Bunch can answer those questions for himself, in his own words, rather than have the rumor mill run away with speculation.

Things that make you go -- hummmmmmm --.

If this was the one, I believe I answered it perfectly clearly.




Did you miss that post on page 1?

1. The banner ad on www.BentonCountyWikiLeaks.us that some found offending was changed several days ago ... nobody asked, it was just changed.

2. Pointing out Burns being a resident and taxpayer of Covington, causing the harrassment of my business interest in Benton County, and the biased TV news making the Taylors look like helpless victims of mean old Charlie, while they live in a toxic zoo with much worse conditions that the 6 piggies 200 feet from their house, was the intent of the long post.

Thanks SaintT for having the common sense to see the story from a neutral point of view.

3. The graphics based post was intended to dis-allow someone from copy and pasting my words out of context. But, John Bartons House, John Bartons Rules! Won't happen again.

4. Until I have significant information of interest to anyone other than JK I will not be replying to the JK fishing expedition. I have provided viewers with facts and opinions based on a reasonable belief there's a factual basis, not speculation.

5. I'm not here to spar with JK, just show all who really have an interest in Benton County, that yes, the same group of people who tried to topple the Thornton Administration, followed by the Wiseman Administration, is now on the attack to topple the Barnett Administration. Yes, the Good-Ole-Boys have a new target. The inmates have taken over the asylum.

6. CWAG - There is a $100.00 annual privilege tax due before January 31st to keep beer permits active. Beer permits do not expire. They can only be Suspended, Revoked, or forfieted if the annual tax is not paid. None of those circumstances occured in this case. JD Sullivan is the ONLY one who can surrender his permit. It must be closed out on the books and the annual sales taxes for the previous year are due immediately upon closing the account. For example, beer permits are required to be posted in a conspicuous public place. If a drunk takes the beer permit off the wall without the bartenders knowledge, and the next day leaves it at the County Clerk's Office, has it been surrendered? Of course not. The Mayor and County Attorney knew Mr. Sullivan did not surender, or authorize the surender of his valid permit. Mark Davis made a mistake in taking it in on January 10th, prior to believing his would be "issued". But Mark Davis was not authorized by JD Sullivan to even take the permit off the wall.

a. On January 28th I paid the $100.00 tax and got a computer generated reciept showing the permit still active in the County Clerks Computer System. On Monday the 31st, Mr. Sullivan called Mayor Barnett and asked if I could pick up his permit, his reply was yes. On Tuesday the 1st, Mayor Barnett accompanied me to the County Clerks Office where the Beer Permit was handed to me without any "void" on it. Of course it was not void because the computer showed it active and they had collected the $100.00 fee within the statutory time.

b. That night it was announced on this site we had our valid permit returned.

c. As of two days ago, we learned thru a certified letter, that on Wednesday the 2nd, less than 24 hours after the announcement on this site of the returned valid permit, Wanda Malin had mailed a one paragraph letter saying the permit had been voided, but no reason why was given. Attached was a $100.00 refund check and a photo copy which now had "void" written in black magic marker, once across the face of the document. There was also an attached copy of the reciept from January 28, showing the permit valid at that time. During that same time period, JK began spewing the message the permit was void. COINCIDENCE IN TIMING?

d. So in less than 24 hours of "someone" from the beer board finding out the valid permit was returned, "someone" from the beer board went to the clerks office and ordered it voided. The Mayor told me he could not over-rule the beer board and they have obviously revolked the permit, now, without due process.

e. The mayor told me it would have to be settled in court as he's powerless over beer board decisions or consequences. The County Attorney believes the beer permit is "NOT VOID" but cannot over-rule the beer board, only advise them. I have him on voicemail saying it is not void. He can only wait and watch as the lawsuits pile up and the tax dollars of the County flow into defense attorney hands, and settlement awards.

So I hope that answers the important questions, will keep you guys updated when the next lawsuit is filed. This is now a case for a judge, I will not engage in any further replies from JK, he will next answer under oath. His insults directed to me only add to the case. I'll just let out some more rope and see how much tighter he makes his own noose. A "Wise Man" in his position would shut up. His next post will determine if he's wise. You guys be the judge.

Charles Bunch

I would advise JD Sullivan to file criminal charges of theft against the person the SURRENDERED his permit.
Is he willing to do that? A permit is a valuable document according to the law. If someone went in your house and stole an original copy of the Declaration Of Independence, it would amount to the same thing. File criminal charges against the thief.

The board did not take any action to revoke the permit, it was surrendered, you even stated, agreed, that it was surrendered at an open, legal meeting of the beer board.

A wise man, which you seem to want people to believe you are, wouldn't have already saturated the email in-boxes
of every one in the county with so much distortion of fact it makes for a good fiction novel.

Will this be a jury trial you'll be seeking? I hope so.
Will you be asking for additional damages above and beyond the $140,000.00 that has been asked for "to avoid litigation"?

You just might find yourself on the other end of a lawsuit yourself with the false accusations you have made against good people of the county.

Will you be acting "pro Se" as usual, or will Mr. King be handling this for you?

How did they halt the sale of the property??? Perhaps the letter sent out by Sullivan got the attention of some people. IF, and that is a big IF, you really had a lease or contract for sale on the property a wise businessman as you claim to be would have kept his mouth shut until the deal was final.

SaintT, under advice of counsel I have been asked to cease posting on this site other than to do public notifications which would necessarily be made available through other media outlets. If you wish to ask any further questions of me outside this forum, please do so thru the email link on the "Pleased to meet you..." site.

Charlie

Charlie I do thank you for your direct answer that did answer a question I did have, but the point you made before that does worry me;



It show's either a total lack of knowledge of this counties political history or that since your arrival in Benton County that you have hung out with the wrong people. The Administration of Wiseman, before that of Thornton, and even before him are the true reasons this county is in its current situation. Illegal Spending, Wasteful Spending, Local Business owners being allowed to threaten potential industry because they new industry would pay more and lure away their under paid labor, and other shady and highly questionable activities like a member of the Mayor's office contacting a former mayor to rebid after his sealed bid had been open and rejected are just the tip of the iceberg to the damage the true Good Ole Boys have done to this county over the past few decades. Those Administrations needed toppling and the Citizens Group which is not and has never been lead by Joe Kyle had the biggest hand in awakening the people of this county to see those people for what they are Shysters and Criminals leaving this county with hardly any industry and as the Landfill Capital of the State.

Like I said, I can't wait for it to go to court. That is where proof rises to the top.

It's a shame that Mr. Bunch refuses to take that polygraph test with me, and everyone else he has falsely accused in his delusional writings.

I noticed that he said that being a former law enforcement officer, he knows that polygraph results are not admissible in court. Actually, he is very, very mistaken.

Polygraph results ARE admissible in Civil Court, as long as all parties agree to make them admissible and part of the record.

My personal feelings have nothing to do with the beer board or any beer permit. The board is bound by law, not personalities. I did not deny Charles Bunch, or Mr. Sullivan a permit, I do not have the authority to deny or approve any application for a permit. The board is made up of 5 people, no single person possesses the ability to make a unilateral decision on any matter. Further, Neither have had an application come before the board for consideration to be denied or approved.

Do you know his neighbor to declare that they are "unbalanced"? I don't, so I cannot make that assessment. I doubt if you can either based on a complaint and no trial, finding of, or admission of guilt.

I have not threatened Mr. Bunch in any way at all. His accusation alone against so many people of threats and the specific people he is accusing should be enough to make people laugh at the very idea.

Last, I would be ashamed of the judicial system if a person won a lawsuit based on what they are or who they are and not on Law, Fact, Evidence, and Proof. Mr. Bunch will not prevail because he is wrong, period.

I certainly hope this court business doesn't drag out too long, it needs to be over with. You should realize polygraphs are about as useful as a deck of Tarro cards. I refer you to Penn and Tell's Bullshit show Season 7 Episode 5. If you can't trust a couple of atheist who deal in slight of hand on a daily basis, who can you trust?

https://antipolygraph.or.../YaBB.pl?num=1247844645



According to what CB posted, you must have an impostor "someone" giving orders to Wanda Malin. I believe I'd be hunting this person.

d. So in less than 24 hours of "someone" from the beer board finding out the valid permit was returned, "someone" from the beer board went to the clerks office and ordered it voided. The Mayor told me he could not over-rule the beer board and they have obviously revolked the permit, now, without due process.


That's the whole problem JK when no one take the threat of murder seriously. The man was arrested for a verbal threat and you can claim you don't know enough to judge whether he needs a mental health exam? If one of your neighbors came on your property making such threats and you had him arrested, wouldn't you want the person to have a mental health evaluation not only for you own safety but the person making such a threat? This is exactly why we have so many Arizona incidents. The warning signs are being ignored. Even when the threat is known to be real as with the black man killing the cop (washington state I think it was) then the cops killing him there isn't any mechanisms in place to deal with it. Hopefully after this latest incident more mental health spending will occur.

Then you deny you and another person went to his bar to "persuade" him to move his pigs?

You definitely have a black and white view of the law. The "what they are or who they are" is well documented. The disproportunate number of blacks compared to whites in prison as an example. Your location and presentation can make all the difference in the world. OJ is a great example. Innocent by a jury of "his peers".

Oh, you can put me in the 3% column of your vote. All beer boards are just a hindrance to free enterprise sale of beer and liquor. If you want to regulate a product why not regulate lottery tickets to self-serve kiosks so those purchasers won't be clogging up the checkout lines of people are trying to buy something of value, like a beer!!!